Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2023; 15(1): 13-22
Published online Jan 26, 2023. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i1.13
Table 2 Comparison between patients with total occlusion of culprit artery compared to patients with > thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 2 flow

Patients with TIMI- ≤ 1 flow (n = 54)
Patients with TIMI- ≥ 2 flow (n = 98)
P value
Age, yr60.5 ± 10.260.5 ± 10.70.9
Time of presentation to hospital after chest pain onset (h)13.4 ± 11.212.3 ± 8.80.24
Hypertension33 (61)71 (65)0.3
Active smokers16 (29.6)36 (32.4)0.3
EF < 30%23 (42.6)33 (29.7)0.1
Cardiogenic shock10 (18.5)15 (13.5)0.4
Complete heart block8 (14.8)7 (6.3)0.07
Time to initiation of medical treatment, h77.3 ± 6374.5 ± 660.87
Time to angiography, h107 ± 79113 ± 1410.84
CK-MB101.2 ± 9075 ± 83.40.11
Platelet (× 109/L)1.89 ± 0.72.0 ± 0.910.17
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)0.59 ± 0.71.0 ± 2.60.27
TLC (× 109/L)10.6 ± 3.810.7 ± 3.90.8
CRP (mg/dL)47.2 ± 34.339.7 ± 28.40.16
Fibrinogen (gm/L)6.9 ± 1.045.4 ± 1.20.001
Albumin (gm/dL)3.3 ± 0.353.4 ± 0.320.014
FAR21.1 ± 3.915.6 ± 4.10.001