©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2017; 9(7): 161-166
Published online Jul 27, 2017. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i7.161
Published online Jul 27, 2017. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i7.161
Table 2 Predictors of perforation
| Perforation | P value | |||
| Did not occur | Occurred | |||
| Sex | M | 33 | 6 | |
| F | 18 | 2 | 0.704 | |
| Histological diagnosis | Adenoma | 33 | 5 | |
| Carcinoma | 18 | 3 | 1.000 | |
| Tumor location | Pre-ampulla | 31 | 4 | |
| Post-ampulla | 20 | 4 | 0.704 | |
| Tumor size | Under 20 mm | 42 | 3 | |
| Over 20 mm | 9 | 5 | 0.014 | |
| Macroscopic type | Polyploid | 11 | 1 | |
| Superficial | 40 | 7 | 0.482 | |
| Resection method | EMR | 34 | 2 | |
| ESD | 17 | 6 | 0.047 | |
| Prophylactic clipping1 | Not applied | 10 | 0 | |
| Applied | 41 | 5 | 1.000 | |
- Citation: Matsuda Y, Sakamoto K, Kataoka N, Yamaguchi T, Tomita M, Makimoto S. Perforation associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal neoplasm without a papillary portion. World J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 9(7): 161-166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v9/i7/161.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v9.i7.161