Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2013; 5(8): 245-251
Published online Aug 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i8.245
Published online Aug 27, 2013. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i8.245
Table 2 Operative variables
| OHR (n = 18) | LHR (n = 28) | P value | |
| Extent of mobilization | 0.5 | ||
| Splenic flexure | 16 (88.9) | 27 (96.4) | |
| Transverse | 2 (11.1) | 1 (3.6) | |
| Stapled end-to-end anastomosis N° (mm) | 0.07 | ||
| N° 28 | 0 (0) | 2 (7.1) | |
| N° 29 | 18 (100) | 21 (75) | |
| N° 31 | 0 (0) | 5 (17.9) | |
| Operation time (min) | 235.8 ± 43.6 | 171.1 ± 27.4 | 0.001 |
| Estimated blood loss (mL) | 301.1 ± 54.6 | 225 ± 38.6 | 0.001 |
- Citation: de’Angelis N, Brunetti F, Memeo R, Batista da Costa J, Schneck AS, Carra MC, Azoulay D. Comparison between open and laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure for diverticulitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 5(8): 245-251
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v5/i8/245.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v5.i8.245