Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 106264
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264
Table 6 Pathological examination and follow-up, n (%)
Indicator | Conventional bowel preparation group (n = 65) | Enhanced bowel preparation group (n = 65) | P value |
Pathological confirmation of malignancy | 5 (7.7) | 4 (6.2) | 0.76 |
6-month recurrence rate | 10.8% (7/65) | 3.1% (2/65) | 0.05 |
Late complications | 2 (3.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0.10 |
Tumor marker levels (CA19-9) | 35.2 ± 10.3 | 28.1 ± 8.5 | 0.02 |
Tumor marker levels (CEA) | 4.8 ± 1.2 | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 0.04 |
Lymph node metastasis rate | 12.3% (8/65) | 7.7% (5/65) | 0.32 |
Postoperative infection rate | 7.7% (5/65) | 3.1% (2/65) | 0.10 |
Patient satisfaction with the pathological results | 80.0% (52/65) | 87.7% (57/65) | 0.12 |
- Citation: Ma YP, Zheng XY, Shen XF, Ling YT, Qian MP, Ni MJ. Impact of enhanced bowel preparation on complications and prognosis following colonoscopic polypectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 106264
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/106264.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264