Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 106264
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264
Table 2 Bowel preparation quality
Indicator | Conventional bowel preparation group (n = 65) | Enhanced bowel preparation group (n = 65) | P value |
Boston bowel preparation scale score | |||
Total score | 3.1 ± 0.8 | 4.2 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 |
Rectum-sigmoid | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | < 0.001 |
Transverse-descending | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 |
Ascending-cecum | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | < 0.001 |
Adequacy of the bowel preparation rate | 85.0% (55/65) | 92.3% (60/65) | 0.04 |
Cecal intubation rate | 90.8% (59/65) | 95.4% (62/65) | 0.21 |
Withdrawal time (min) | 6.2 ± 1.2 | 8.1 ± 1.4 | < 0.001 |
Adenoma detection rate | 30.8% (20/65) | 38.5% (25/65) | 0.23 |
Sessile serrated lesion detection rate | 5.0% (3/65) | 7.7% (5/65) | 0.42 |
Frequency of recommending an appropriate screening or surveillance interval | 86.2% (56/65) | 93.8% (61/65) | 0.12 |
- Citation: Ma YP, Zheng XY, Shen XF, Ling YT, Qian MP, Ni MJ. Impact of enhanced bowel preparation on complications and prognosis following colonoscopic polypectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 106264
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/106264.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264