Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 106069
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106069
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106069
Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative characteristics between the two groups, n (%)
Experimental group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 46) | P value | |
Complete wound closure | > 0.999 | ||
Yes | 44 (100) | 46 (100) | |
No | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
En bloc resection | > 0.999 | ||
Yes | 44 (100) | 46 (100) | |
No | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Intraoperative bleeding | > 0.999 | ||
Yes | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
No | 44 (100) | 46 (100) | |
Gas complication | |||
Subcutaneous emphysema | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | > 0.999 |
Pneumomediastinum | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | > 0.999 |
Severe pneumothorax | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | > 0.999 |
Severe pneumoperitoneum | 1 (2.27) | 12 (26.09) | 0.001 |
Operative time [M, (Q1, Q3), minute] | 29.5 (20.0, 39.0) | 29.5 (20.0, 48.0) | 0.474 |
Intraoperative traction | 0.673 | ||
Yes | 8 (18.18) | 10 (21.74) | |
No | 36 (81.82) | 36 (78.26) | |
Complete lesion removal | 0.975 | ||
Yes | 43 (97.73) | 45 (97.83) | |
No | 1 (2.27) | 1 (2.17) |
- Citation: Zhang M, Liu J, Dong YP, Zhao Q, Lin ML, Gao TJ, Feng JL, Wang YF, Guo YF, Wang Z, Jia W, Yang Z. Comparison between interrupted closure technique and traditional closure technique in endoscopic full-thickness resection for treating gastric subepithelial lesions. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 106069
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/106069.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106069