Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 106009
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106009
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups of patients, n (%)
Characteristics
Orr group (n = 54)
Modified group (n = 43)
χ2/F
P value
Sex--0.0010.998
Male (cases)41 (75.9)39 (90.7)--
Female (cases)13 (24.1)4 (8.7)--
Age (year), mean ± SD62.38 ± 11.8468.39 ± 10.112.2720.110
BMI
TNM staging (cases)--0.0010.998
I11 (20.4)4 (9.3)--
II5 (9.3)6 (14.0)--
III38 (70.4)33 (76.7)--
Tumor pathological classification (cases)--0.3750.701
Nodule type9 (16.7)4 (9.3)--
Ulceration type31 (57.4)28 (65.1)--
Diffuse invasive14 (25.9)11 (25.6)--
Tumor diameter (cases)--0.0080.991
≤ 1 cm11 (20.4)7 (16.3)--
1-4 cm16 (29.6)11 (25.6)--
> 4 cm27 (50.0)25 (58.1)---
Infiltrative depth (cases)--0.0010.998
T111 (20.4)2 (4.7)--
T22 (3.7)4 (9.3)--
T37 (12.9)4 (9.3)--
T434 (63.0)33 (76.7)--
Lymphatic metastasis (cases)--0.0070.992
N025 (46.3)17 (39.5)--
N17 (13.0)6 (13.9)--
N29 (16.7)9 (21.0)--
N313 (24.0)11 (25.6)--