Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 104545
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104545
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104545
Table 2 Comparison of general information between two groups of patients, n (%)
Project | Chemotherapy ineffective group (n = 35) (tumor residual ≥ 50%) | Chemotherapy effective group (n = 62) (tumor residual < 50%) | t/χ2 | P value |
Age | 62.35 + 8.42 | 61.87 + 9.13 | 0.258 | 0.797 |
Gender | 0.342 | 0.559 | ||
Male | 24 (68.57) | 39 (62.90) | ||
Female | 11 (31.43) | 23 (37.10) | ||
Staging | 0.876 | 0.349 | ||
Stage II | 13 (37.14) | 29 (46.77) | ||
Stage III | 22 (62.86) | 33 (53.23) | ||
Location | 0.523 | 0.470 | ||
Cardia | 15 (42.86) | 31 (50.00) | ||
Gastric body | 20 (57.14) | 31 (50.00) | ||
Lauren's classification | 1.247 | 0.536 | ||
Diffuse type | 14 (40.00) | 21 (33.87) | ||
Mixed type | 8 (22.86) | 19 (30.65) | ||
Intestinal type | 13 (37.14) | 22 (35.48) |
- Citation: Wang CY, Zhang L, Ma JW. Computed tomography 3D reconstruction and texture analysis for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 104545
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/104545.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104545