Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 104192
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104192
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104192
Table 1 General information of two groups
Indicators | Research group (n = 39) | Control group (n = 39) | t/χ2 | P value |
Age (years) | 58.31 ± 7.30 | 55.69 ± 6.52 | 1.672 | 0.099 |
Sex (male/female) | 12/27 | 18/21 | 1.950 | 0.163 |
Tumor diameter (cm) | 2.33 ± 0.99 | 1.95 ± 0.68 | 1.976 | 0.052 |
Lymphatic vessel infiltration (positive/negative) | 8/31 | 9/30 | 0.075 | 0.784 |
Differentiation degree (high differentiation/moderate-low differentiation) | 6/33 | 5/34 | 0.106 | 0.745 |
Preoperative imaging staging (stage I/stage II) | 5/34 | 4/35 | 0.126 | 0.723 |
- Citation: Qiu TH, Wen HY, Chen MM. Effect of double-tract reconstruction and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy on immune function and stress. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 104192
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/104192.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.104192