Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 103030
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030
Table 4 Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of two ultrasonography methods for acute gangrenous appendicitis
Diagnostic method | Nature | Gold standard (units) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | |
Positive | Negative | |||||||
Conventional abdominal ultrasonography | Positive | 15 | 8 | 62.50 | 83.33 | 76.39 | 65.22 | 81.63 |
Negative | 9 | 40 | ||||||
Transabdominal superficial ultrasonography | Positive | 23 | 1 | 95.83 | 97.92 | 97.22 | 85.83 | 97.92 |
Negative | 1 | 47 | ||||||
χ2 | - | - | - | 8.084 | 6.008 | 13.642 | 7.111 | 6.954 |
P value | - | - | - | 0.004 | 0.014 | < 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.008 |
- Citation: Yue YZ, Hu Q, Lu TX. Diagnostic efficacy, imaging characteristics, and detection accuracy of transabdominal superficial ultrasonography for various types of appendicitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 103030
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/103030.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030