Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 103030
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030
Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of two ultrasonography methods for detecting acute simple appendicitis
Diagnostic method | Nature | Gold standard (units) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | |
Positive | Negative | |||||||
Conventional abdominal ultrasonography | Positive | 13 | 11 | 59.09 | 78.00 | 72.22 | 54.17 | 81.25 |
Negative | 9 | 39 | ||||||
Transabdominal superficial ultrasonography | Positive | 20 | 3 | 90.91 | 94.00 | 93.06 | 86.96 | 95.92 |
Negative | 2 | 47 | ||||||
χ2 | - | - | - | 5.939 | 5.316 | 10.891 | 6.038 | 5.189 |
P value | - | - | - | 0.015 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 0.014 | 0.023 |
- Citation: Yue YZ, Hu Q, Lu TX. Diagnostic efficacy, imaging characteristics, and detection accuracy of transabdominal superficial ultrasonography for various types of appendicitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 103030
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/103030.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030