Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2025; 17(6): 103030
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030
Published online Jun 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030
Table 1 Diagnostic efficiency of two ultrasonography methods
Diagnostic method | Nature | Gold standard (units) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | Positive predictive value (%) | Negative predictive value (%) | |
Positive | Negative | |||||||
Conventional abdominal ultrasonography | Positive | 60 | 10 | 83.33 | 64.29 | 78.00 | 85.71 | 60.00 |
Negative | 12 | 18 | ||||||
Transabdominal superficial ultrasonography | Positive | 70 | 2 | 97.22 | 92.86 | 96.00 | 97.22 | 92.86 |
Negative | 2 | 26 | ||||||
χ2 | - | - | - | 7.912 | 6.778 | 14.324 | 6.076 | 8.539 |
P value | - | - | - | 0.005 | 0.009 | < 0.001 | 0.014 | 0.003 |
- Citation: Yue YZ, Hu Q, Lu TX. Diagnostic efficacy, imaging characteristics, and detection accuracy of transabdominal superficial ultrasonography for various types of appendicitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(6): 103030
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i6/103030.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103030