©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2024; 16(4): 1109-1120
Published online Apr 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1109
Published online Apr 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1109
Figure 5 Postoperative gastroscopy results of the two groups of patients.
A-D: Double-tract reconstruction: Image of esophagus under gastroscope (A), image of esophagojejunal anastomosis under gastroscope (B), image of proximal jejunum under gastroscope (C), and image of duodenal jejunum anastomosis under gastroscope (D); E-H: Roux-en-Y reconstruction: Image of esophagus under gastroscope (E), image of esophagojejunal anastomosis under gastroscope (F), image of proximal jejunum under gastroscope (G), and image of distal jejunum under gastroscope (H).
- Citation: Dong TX, Wang D, Zhao Q, Zhang ZD, Zhao XF, Tan BB, Liu Y, Liu QW, Yang PG, Ding PA, Zheng T, Li Y, Liu ZJ. Comparative analysis of two digestive tract reconstruction methods in total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(4): 1109-1120
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i4/1109.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1109