©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Aug 15, 2025; 16(8): 108166
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108166
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108166
Table 3 The secondary outcomes: Wound healing, serum 25(OH)D levels, immune markers, and adverse events
| Secondary outcome | VD group (n = 60) | Control group (n = 60) | P value |
| Wound healing | |||
| Baseline ulcer size (cm²) | 5.6 | 5.4 | - |
| Ulcer size at 6 weeks (cm²) | 3.6 (35% reduction from baseline) | 4.3 (20% reduction from baseline) | - |
| Ulcer size at 12 weeks (cm²) | 2.2 (60% reduction from baseline) | 3.5 (35% reduction from baseline) | < 0.01 |
| Complete ulcer closure (%) | 20% | 10% | - |
| Serum 25(OH)D levels (ng/mL) | |||
| Baseline | 16.5 ± 4.8 | 17.1 ± 5.0 | 0.47 |
| Post-intervention (12 weeks) | 35.2 ± 7.5 | 18.3 ± 5.2 | < 0.001 |
| Immune markers | |||
| Cathelicidin (change from baseline) | +30% | No significant change | < 0.01 |
| Pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α) | -20% | No significant change | 0.02 |
| Adverse events | |||
| Hypercalcemia | 0 cases | 0 cases | - |
| Other side effects | None reported | None reported | - |
- Citation: Gao YQ, Gao YH, Xing JH. Vitamin D supplementation reduces infection rate and promotes wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(8): 108166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v16/i8/108166.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108166