Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Diabetes. Feb 15, 2024; 15(2): 240-250
Published online Feb 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i2.240
Figure 1
Figure 1 Study population flow. CVD: Cardiovascular disease; OGTT: Oral glucose tolerance test.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Prevalence of metabolic syndrome components by age intervals. MS: Metabolic syndrome.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Importance matrix plot of the random forest model. This importance matrix plot depicts the importance of each covariate in the final predictive model. A: Younger group; B: Older group. CVD: Cardiovascular disease; BMI: Body mass index; WC: Waist circumference; FPG: Fasting plasma glucose; PG2h: 2 h post-load plasma glucose; TC: Total cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; HDL-c: High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-c: Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SHAP: SHapley Additive exPlanation.
Figure 4
Figure 4 SHapley Additive exPlanation summary plot of the features of the random forest model. The higher the SHapley Additive exPlanation value of a feature, the higher the probability of the 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease. A dot is created for each feature attribution value for each individual, and thus one individual is allocated one dot on the line for each feature. Dots are colored according to the values of features for the respective individual and accumulate vertically to depict density. Purple represents higher feature values, and yellow represents lower feature values. A: Younger group; B: Older group. CVD: Cardiovascular disease; BMI: Body mass index; WC: Waist circumference; FPG: Fasting plasma glucose; PG2h: 2 h post-load plasma glucose; TC: Total cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; HDL-c: High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-c: Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SHAP: SHapley Additive exPlanation.