Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2017; 9(11): 444-451
Published online Nov 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444
Published online Nov 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444
Table 1 Comparison of the different subgroups
| pT1 subgroup | Total | m1 | m2 | m3 | m4 | sm |
| No. of cases (n) | 83 | 13 | 36 | 5 | 13 | 16 |
| Tumour thickness (mm) | 0.2-4.7 | 0.2-0.8 | 0.3-1.4 | 0.9-1.0 | 0.8-3.4 | 1.0-4.7 |
| Mean ± SD (mm) | - | 0.46 ± 0.19 | 0.64 ± 0.24 | 0.91 ± 0.05 | 1.78 ± 0.79 | 2.69 ± 1.03 |
- Citation: Endhardt K, Märkl B, Probst A, Schaller T, Aust D. Value of histomorphometric tumour thickness and smoothelin for conventional m-classification in early oesophageal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 9(11): 444-451
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v9/i11/444.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i11.444