Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2016; 8(9): 695-706
Published online Sep 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i9.695
Table 4 Analysis of the effect of factors on pathological tumor regression grade
TRGRelationship between demographics and TRG (p) and OR with 95%CI
Distribution and comparison of TRG rates in both groups
AgeSexTumor localizationPreop T stagePreop stageGroup I (n = 45)Group II (n = 42)P value
%%
Complete response(0.46)(0.84)(0.17)(0.24)(0.48)(n = 4)(n = 8)0.36
2.19, 95%CI: 0.55-8.720.54, 95%CI: 0.12-2.290.66, 95%CI: 0.15-2.921.00, 95%CI: 0.90-1.501.21, 95%CI: 0.12-11.88.919
Near complete response(0.91)(0.79)(0.38)(0.75)(0.80)(n = 9)(n = 14)0.35
1.02, 95%CI: 0.37-2.791.11, 95%CI: 0.36-3.381.93, 95%CI: 0.64-5.80.50, 95%CI: 0.12-2.570.36, 95%CI: 0.10-1.512033.3
Minimal response(0.79)(0.59)(0.12)(0.66)(0.38)(n = 12)(n = 16)0.15
0.67, 95%CI: 0.25-1.761.25, 95%CI: 0.43-3.630.45, 95%CI: 0.16-1.202.25, 95%CI: 0.36-13.82.02, 95%CI: 0.37-10.926.738.1
Poor response(0.48)(0.95)(0.11)(0.19)(0.70)(n = 20)(n = 4)0.002
0.98, 95%CI: 0.35-2.760.94, 95%CI: 0.31-2.821.65, 95%CI: 0.56-4.843.22, 95%CI: 0.92-11.21.34, 95%CI: 0.23-7.6244.49.5