Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2026; 18(9): 120566
Published online Sep 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.120566
Published online Sep 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.120566
Table 3 Comparison of treatment strategies for early esophageal cancer
| Treatment strategy | Advantages | Limitations |
| Esophagectomy | Complete tumor and lymph node removal; established oncologic standard for invasive disease | Highly invasive; significant perioperative morbidity and mortality; long recovery; loss of gastroesophageal junction; impaired quality of life |
| Endoscopic mucosal resection | Minimally invasive; low procedure-related mortality; effective for small, superficial mucosal lesions; short recovery time | Limited to small lesions; often requires piecemeal resection; reduced accuracy of pathological margin assessment; higher local recurrence for large lesions |
| Endoscopic submucosal dissection | En bloc resection regardless of lesion size; precise pathological evaluation; lower recurrence rates; organ preservation | Technically demanding; longer procedure time; higher risk of perforation and stricture; limited availability in some regions |
- Citation: Peng QY, Huang XP. Endoscopic and surgical management of early esophageal cancer: Current evidence and evolving oncologic strategies. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(9): 120566
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i9/120566.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.120566