Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2026; 18(7): 120437
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.120437
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.120437
Table 1 Baseline characteristic comparison (development vs temporally independent test cohort), mean ± SD/n (%)
| Characteristics | Development cohort (n = 680) | Independent test cohort (n = 170) | Statistic | P value |
| Age (years) | 62.56 ± 10.70 | 63.24 ± 11.44 | 0.918 | 0.359 |
| Sex (male/female) | 375/305 | 95/75 | 0.030 | 0.863 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.5 ± 3.2 | 23.8 ± 3.4 | t = 1.06 | 0.291 |
| Ileus | 0.803 | 0.370 | ||
| Yes | 68 (10.0) | 21 (12.4) | ||
| No | 612 (90.0) | 149 (87.6) | ||
| Tumor location | ||||
| Colon cancer | 425 (62.5) | 105 (61.8) | χ2 test | 0.861 |
| Rectal cancer | 255 (37.5) | 65 (38.2) | ||
| Maximum tumor diameter (cm) | 4.2 ± 1.8 | 4.3 ± 1.7 | t-test | 0.512 |
| Preoperative CEA (≥ 5 ng/mL) | 306 (45.0) | 77 (45.3) | 0.005 | 0.945 |
| T-staging | ||||
| T1 | 85 (12.5) | 22 (12.9) | 0.051 | 0.997 |
| T2 | 170 (25.0) | 43 (25.3) | ||
| T3 | 306 (45.0) | 75 (44.1) | ||
| T4 | 119 (17.5) | 30 (17.6) | ||
| N-staging | ||||
| N0 | 374 (55.0) | 93 (54.7) | 0.020 | 0.995 |
| N1 | 204 (30.0) | 51 (30.0) | ||
| N2 | 102 (15.0) | 26 (15.3) | ||
| Pathological differentiation | 0.203 | 0.652 | ||
| High/moderate differentiation | 476 (70.0) | 122 (71.8) | ||
| Poor differentiation/mucinous adenocarcinoma | 204 (30.0) | 48 (28.2) | ||
| Image quality score | ||||
| 3 points (acceptable) | 204 (30.0) | 51 (30.0) | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| 4 points (good) | 340 (50.0) | 85 (50.0) | ||
| 5 points (excellent) | 136 (20.0) | 34 (20.0) |
- Citation: Zhao J, Du LJ, Liu Y, Zhu DD, Wang HQ, Shen MK, Wang LY, Wang HY. Development and clinical application of an ultrasound-based deep learning model for preoperative staging of colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 120437
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i7/120437.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.120437