BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2026; 18(7): 118522
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118522
Table 1 Criteria for defining successful conversion and surgical decision-making
Category
Criterion
Definition/threshold
Assessment method and timing
Overall requirementMDT consensusAgreement by hepatobiliary surgery, interventional radiology, and oncologyMDT review after every 2 cycles of therapy
Radiological responseObjective tumor responseAchieve complete or partial response according to RECIST 11 and/or modified RECISTContrast-enhanced CT/magnetic resonance imaging every 6 weeks; response must be confirmed on two consecutive scans ≥ 4 weeks apart
Technical resectabilityTumor downstaging to allow for a potential R0 resection. Regression of major vascular involvement (e.g., portal vein tumor thrombus)Volumetric and anatomical assessment via imaging
Liver function and volumeFLR volumeFLR > 40% of standardized total liver volumeCT volumetry prior to surgical decision
Liver function reserveChild-Pugh score ≤ 7Laboratory and clinical evaluation every 3 weeks
ICG 15-minute retention rate ≤ 20%ICG clearance test prior to surgical decision
Patient general statusPerformance statusEastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score: 0-1Clinical assessment every 3 weeks
Systemic disease controlExtrahepatic metastasisAbsence of new or progressive extrahepatic metastasesChest CT and baseline extrahepatic imaging every 6 weeks
Surgical safetyMajor organ functionNo severe, uncontrolled comorbidities precluding major surgery (cardiopulmonary, renal insufficiency, etc.)Comprehensive preoperative anesthesiology evaluation


Write to the Help Desk