Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2026; 18(6): 119114
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.119114
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.119114
Table 1 Comparative spatial and molecular metrics of gastric cancer tumor immune microenvironment phenotypes
| Metric | Immune-inflamed (“hot“) | Immune-excluded (“cold“) | Immune-desert (“cold“) |
| Predominant subtype | Epstein-Barr virus+, microsatellite instability-high | Genomically stable (genomically stable) | Chromosomal Instability |
| Dominant chemokine axis | CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3 | CXCL12-CXCR4 | Low/absent |
| B-cell/TLS organization | Mature TLS (secondary follicles) with gastric cancer reaction; high B-cell diversity | Immature TLS or disorganized B-cell aggregates at the margin | Absent or rare B-cell clusters; lack of TLS formation |
| Stroma density (collagen) | Low/moderate | High (cross-linked lysyl oxidase-like 2 + fibers) | Variable |
| T-cell factor 1 + T-cell niche | Present in mature TLS | Restricted to invasive margin 15 | Absent |
| Response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 | High (50%-70%) | Low (primary resistance) | Negligible |
- Citation: Yao ZY, Ma LJ, Han ZX, Ji GJ. Evolving landscape of the gastric cancer immune microenvironment: From spatial architecture to precision biomarkers. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(6): 119114
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i6/119114.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.119114