Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2026; 18(6): 118976
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.118976
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.118976
Table 3 Summary of selected clinical studies on cryoablation combined with immunotherapy for liver cancers
| Design | Patient population (line of therapy) | Intervention details | Key efficacy and survival outcomes (assessment criteria) | Key baseline confounders (tumor burden, PVTT, liver function) | Key immunological findings | Ref. |
| Case report | Advanced HCC, post-multiline therapy (post-resection, post-lenvatinib failure) | Bevacizumab + immune checkpoint inhibitors + intratumoral cryoablation (of a single metastasis) | mRECIST, sustained CR lasting > 24 months | Tumor burden: High (multifocal intrahepatic metastases + lymph node involvement); PVTT: Yes (noted in primary tumor); liver function: NR (HBV-positive, well-controlled on therapy) | Tumor mutational burden increased from 3 Muts/Mb to 18.67 Muts/Mb post-cryoablation (biopsy of a separate, non-ablated lesion) | Li et al[91], 2021 |
| Case report | Advanced, multifocal HCC, post-sorafenib and nivolumab (human immunodeficiency virus/HBV co-infection) | Cryoablation (partial, of 2 sites) + nivolumab - liver transplant | The mRECIST, durable CR; bridged to successful liver transplantation > 4 years post-treatment | Tumor burden: High (multifocal, bilobar, infiltrative progression); PVTT: NR; liver function: Cirrhosis (Child-Pugh score NR, HBV-DNA undetectable) | Potent “abscopal effect”: Cryoablation of partial lesions triggered a systemic immune response, leading to regression of untreated, multifocal intrahepatic tumors and reversal of immunotherapy resistance | Lucas et al[92], 2024 |
| Phase II study (preliminary results) NCT04724226 | Advanced HCC with PVTT; first-line therapy | Cryoablation (to inactivate lesions as much as possible) –within 48 hours, start combination therapy with camrelizumab (anti-PD-1) + apatinib | ORR (mRECIST): 71.4%; ORR (RECIST v1.1): 14.3%; mPFS (mRECIST): 4.63 months; mOS: 19.0 months | Tumor burden: Limited (“up-to-7” criteria); PVTT: Yes (100% of patients, 57.1% with Vp3/4); liver function: Child-Pugh A (all patients, scores of 5 or 6) | Increase in CD8+ T cells; decrease in regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells | Gao et al[82], 2025 |
| CASTLE-01 single-arm, phase II NCT05010668 | Locally advanced or metastatic ICC; post first-line gemcitabine + cisplatin (second-line) | Partial cryoablation of one intrahepatic lesion, followed by combination therapy with sintilimab (anti-PD-1) + lenvatinib | ORR: 75.0% (21/28, including 2 CR); disease control rate: 100%; mPFS: 16.8 months; mOS: 25.4 months (RECIST v1.1) | Tumor burden: High (79% TNM stage IV, advanced/metastatic); PVTT: Not specifically reported; liver function: Predominantly well-preserved (all enrolled had Child-Pugh class A; 11% had cirrhosis) | Cryoablation triggered recruitment and clonal expansion of CD8+ PD-1hi effector T cells into the TME and enhanced tumor immunogenicity (increased antigen presentation and IFN signaling). Lenvatinib promoted tumor vasculature normalization (increased postcapillary venule ECs, decreased angiogenic tip/stalk ECs), facilitating the influx of novel T cell clones. Combination therapy reshaped a “cold” TME into an inflamed “hot” one, increased CD4+ CXCL13+ T follicular helper cells, and was associated with tertiary lymphoid structures formation | Gu et al[83], 2026 |
| Single-arm study NCT03183219 | Advanced HCC/ICC | Locoregional therapy (incl. cryoablation) + allogeneic γδ T-cell adoptive transfer | HCC: The mPFS 8.0 months vs 4.0 months (combo vs mono), mOS 13.0 months vs 8.0 months; ICC: MPFS 8.0 months vs 4.0 months | Mixed population (HCC and ICC); detailed burden/function: NR | Expansion/persistence of donor γδ T cells; elevated serum IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor-alpha | Zhang et al[93], 2022 |
| Retrospective study | Metastatic HCC; advanced patients unsuitable for or refusing surgery/chemotherapy (not first-line, mostly after prior treatments) | Four groups compared: (1) Comprehensive cryoablation + immunotherapy (cryo-immunotherapy): Complete cryoablation of intrahepatic primary and accessible extrahepatic metastatic lesions, followed by adoptive dendritic cell and cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy cell immunotherapy (4 infusions); (2) Cryotherapy only group; (3) Immunotherapy only group; and (4) Untreated/supportive care group | The mOS: Cryo-immunotherapy group: 32.0 months; cryotherapy only group: 17.5 months; immunotherapy only group: 4.0 months; untreated group: 3.0 months; statistical significance: Overall survival in the cryo-immunotherapy group was significantly longer than in the cryotherapy only group (P = 0.024) and the untreated group (P < 0.01; assessment criteria: Revised RECIST 1.1) | Tumor burden: High. All patients had metastatic disease (bone, lung, or multiple organs). High intrahepatic primary tumor burden (24 cases with single lesion, avg. diameter 6.5 cm; 21 cases with multiple lesions, total 71 lesions). PVTT: Not explicitly mentioned. Liver function: All patients were Child-Pugh class A (25 cases) or B (18 cases); 43/45 (95.6%) had cirrhosis | In the combination therapy group (cryo-immunotherapy), patients showed an increased proportion of CD3+ CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood and elevated serum levels of interleukin-2 and IFN-γ | Niu et al[94], 2013 |
- Citation: Xu JJ, Ni CX, Qin LD, Wang P, Xu JJ. Cryoablation remodels the immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: From mechanistic insights to clinical translation in combination immunotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(6): 118976
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i6/118976.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.118976