Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2026; 18(6): 118531
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.118531
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.118531
Table 2 The salvage surgery and follow-up data of these 38 patients with non-R0 endoscopic resection
| Total (n = 38) | |
| Salvage surgery (%) | |
| ESD | 31.6 (12/38) |
| TEM | 42.1 (16/38) |
| LAR | 5.3 (2/38) |
| Follow-up only without salvage surgery | 21.1 (8/38) |
| With endoscopic biopsy | 37.5 (3/8) |
| Without endoscopic biopsy | 62.5 (5/8) |
| Residual tumor cells (%) | 0.0 (0/33) |
| Follow-up time (month), mean ± SD | 46.4 ± 14.8 |
| Recurrence (%) | 0.0 (0/38) |
- Citation: Lin SY, Li ZH, Xu GL, Weng J, Bai KH. Is salvage surgery necessary for non-R0 endoscopic resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(6): 118531
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i6/118531.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.118531