Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2026; 18(6): 117627
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.117627
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.117627
Table 5 Comparison of nutritional status before nursing care between the two groups, n (%)
| Variable | Subjects of study (n = 80) | Control group (n = 40) | Test group (n = 40) | χ2/t | P value |
| PG-SGA total score, mean ± SD | 6.73 ± 3.57 | 6.96 ± 3.49 | 6.50 ± 3.70 | 0.513 | 0.569 |
| Good nutritional status (PG-SGA-A) | 13 (16.25) | 6 (15.0) | 7 (17.5) | 0.245 | 0.885 |
| Suspected or moderate malnutrition (PG-SGA-B) | 39 (48.75) | 19 (47.5) | 20 (50.0) | - | - |
| Severe malnutrition (PG-SGA-C) | 28 (35.0) | 15 (37.5) | 13 (32.5) | - | - |
- Citation: Zhao GY, Yu J. Impact of bundle care on quality of life and nutrition after transarterial chemoembolization. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(6): 117627
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i6/117627.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.117627