Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2026; 18(6): 116770
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.116770
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.116770
Table 1 Comparison of liver magnetic resonance imaging measurement parameters before and after liver cancer intervention in 120 patients, mean ± SD
| Time | Apparent diffusion coefficient value | Transport constant (minute-1) | Rate constant (minute-1) | Volume fraction | Tumor volume (cm3) |
| Preoperative intervention | 0.89 ± 0.13 | 0.36 ± 0.10 | 0.62 ± 0.15 | 0.57 ± 0.16 | 21.03 ± 3.42 |
| After intervention surgery | 1.23 ± 0.14 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 10.67 ± 2.48 |
| t value | 10.970 | 9.090 | 11.829 | 6.252 | 26.863 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Huang YH, Liu XL, Yang Z. Evaluating the efficacy of interventional hepatocellular carcinoma via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(6): 116770
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i6/116770.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.116770