Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2026; 18(5): 118319
Published online May 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.118319
Published online May 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.118319
Table 2 Selected clinical evidence for immunotherapy combination strategies in microsatellite-stable/proficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer
| Combination strategy/regimen | Clinical setting (population) | Key outcomes | Predictors/caveats | Ref. |
| Pembrolizumab + mFOLFOX7 or FOLFIRI (KEYNOTE-651) | 1 L/2 L advanced CRC (predominantly pMMR/MSS) | Safety acceptable; no clear signal beyond historical chemo in unselected MSS cohorts | Single-arm; chemotherapy confounds ORR; highlights need for biomarker enrichment | Gallois et al[57]; Kim et al[58] |
| Maintenance FP + bevacizumab ± atezolizumab (MODUL) | Post-induction maintenance in mCRC (unselected; largely MSS) | No significant PFS (HR = 0.92) or OS (HR = 0.94) improvement vs control | Negative phase II; subgroup signals require validation | Wang et al[59] |
| CAPOX + bevacizumab + pembrolizumab (FFCD1703-POCHI) | 1 L pMMR/MSS mCRC with high TIL/Immunoscore | ORR = 73% (17% CR); DCR 100%; 12-month PFS 52%; 24-month OS 80% | Biomarker-enriched (high Immunoscore); confirm in larger/controlled studies | Yamaguchi et al[60] |
| Regorafenib + nivolumab (REGONIVO, phase Ib) | Refractory MSS mCRC (Japan) | ORR approximately 33%-36% in CRC cohort; median PFS approximately 7.9 months | Early-phase; later Western studies show lower activity; liver metastases may blunt benefit | Fukuoka et al[65] |
| Regorafenib + nivolumab (phase II) | Refractory MSS mCRC (multicenter United States) | ORR 7% (5/70 PR); median PFS 1.8 months; OS 11.9 months | All responders had no liver metastases | Fakih et al[66] |
| Fruquintinib + sintilimab | Refractory MSS mCRC (China phase II) | ORR 12.5%; DCR 76.4%; median PFS 4.1 months; OS 15.3 months | Liver mets: PFS 3.2 months vs 7.6 months; NLR/albumin/ECOG predictive | Zhang et al[68] |
| Regorafenib + ipilimumab + nivolumab | Refractory MSS mCRC (single-center phase I) | ORR 27.6%; median PFS 4.0 months; OS 20 months; non-liver mets ORR 36.4% | Responses largely confined to nonliver metastatic disease; dose-related skin/immune AEs | Xiao et al[69]; Fakih et al[70] |
| Atezolizumab + cobimetinib (IMblaze370) | Refractory mCRC (predominantly MSS; phase III) | No OS benefit vs regorafenib; ORR approximately 2% | Suggests MEK inhibition alone is insufficient; scheduling/partner choice critical | Eng et al[40] |
| Radiotherapy + ICI (various early-phase) | MSS mCRC; often liver-dominant disease | Clinical benefit inconsistent; abscopal responses uncommon | Dose/fractionation, target lesions, and systemic priming likely determinants | Yang et al[91]; Lee et al[92]; Nelson et al[93]; Hang et al[94] |
| Locoregional therapy + ICI (HIPEC/HAIC/TACE/SIRT; early-phase) | Liver or peritoneal metastases | Primarily early-phase/ongoing; rationale is in situ antigen release and myeloid reprogramming | Safety/sequence critical; endpoints include immune correlatives | Nelson et al[93]; Nevo et al[95]; Jiang et al[96] |
- Citation: Chi F, Liu CB, Li J, Xia XW, Hua QJ, Wang W. Converting cold to hot: Strategies to sensitize microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer to immunotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(5): 118319
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i5/118319.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.118319