Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2026; 18(5): 116640
Published online May 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.116640
Published online May 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.116640
Table 4 Comparison of treatment decisions and intensity between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | n | Initial treatment strategy | Treatment intensity | ||||
| Standard treatment | Palliative therapy | Supportive care only | Normal intensity | Reduced intensity | Low intensity | ||
| Observation group | 102 | 35 (35.3) | 48 (46.1) | 19 (18.6) | 42 (41.2) | 48 (47.1) | 12 (11.8) |
| Control group | 108 | 53 (48.1) | 38 (36.1) | 17 (15.7) | 65 (60.2) | 32 (29.6) | 11 (10.2) |
| χ2/t value | - | 4.427 | 2.686 | 0.332 | 7.699 | 6.941 | 0.139 |
| P value | - | 0.035 | 0.101 | 0.564 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.709 |
- Citation: Zhu L, Liu XF. Comprehensive geriatric assessment guiding treatment and survival in elderly digestive tumor patients: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(5): 116640
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i5/116640.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.116640