Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2026; 18(5): 116640
Published online May 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.116640
Published online May 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.116640
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | n | Age (year), mean ± SD | Gender | Tumor type | ECOG grade (point) | |||||
| Male | Female | Colorectal cancer | Gastric cancer | Esophageal cancer | Liver cancer | Pancreatic cancer | ||||
| Observation group | 102 | 76.5 ± 4.8 | 59 (57.8) | 43 (42.2) | 46 (45.1) | 28 (27.5) | 10 (9.8) | 12 (11.1) | 6 (5.9) | 1.2 ± 0.5 |
| Control group | 108 | 77.1 ± 5.2 | 65 (60.2) | 43 (39.8) | 48 (44.4) | 32 (29.6) | 12 (11.1) | 10 (9.8) | 6 (5.6) | 1.1 ± 0.4 |
| χ2/t value | - | 0.851 | 0.102 | 1.234 | 1.666 | |||||
| P value | - | 0.396 | 0.749 | 0.872 | 0.107 | |||||
- Citation: Zhu L, Liu XF. Comprehensive geriatric assessment guiding treatment and survival in elderly digestive tumor patients: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(5): 116640
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i5/116640.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i5.116640