Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2026; 18(4): 115485
Published online Apr 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i4.115485
Published online Apr 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i4.115485
Table 5 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups
| Infection | Incision dehiscence | Lung infection | Fever | Gastrointestinal complications | Urinary tract infection | Thrombosis | Incidence (%) | |
| Control group (n = 60) | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 43.3 |
| Observation group (n = 60) | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 21.7 |
| χ2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6.42 |
| P value | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | < 0.05 |
- Citation: Chang XM, Cai BH, Zheng HB. Integration of the PIPOST model with early enteral nutrition to enhance postoperative rehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(4): 115485
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i4/115485.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i4.115485