Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2026; 18(4): 115485
Published online Apr 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i4.115485
Published online Apr 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i4.115485
Table 2 Comparison of biochemical nutrition between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Time | Control group (n = 60) | Observation group (n = 60) | t | P value | |
| ALB (g/L) | Preoperative | 34.26 ± 3.15 | 33.98 ± 3.22 | 0.475 | 0.636 |
| 7 days after surgery | 35.27 ± 3.24 | 38.67 ± 3.14 | 5.838 | < 0.05 | |
| PA (mg/L) | Preoperative | 242.37 ± 22.48 | 245.86 ± 30.56 | 0.712 | 0.478 |
| 7 days after surgery | 263.52 ± 36.18 | 292.54 ± 42.42 | 4.033 | < 0.05 | |
| TF (g/L) | Preoperative | 2.12 ± 0.35 | 2.15 ± 0.32 | 0.546 | 0.586 |
| 7 days after surgery | 2.31 ± 0.16 | 2.68 ± 0.29 | 8.552 | < 0.05 |
- Citation: Chang XM, Cai BH, Zheng HB. Integration of the PIPOST model with early enteral nutrition to enhance postoperative rehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(4): 115485
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i4/115485.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i4.115485