©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2026; 18(2): 115404
Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404
Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404
Table 6 Model calibration and clinical net benefit assessment
| Assessment indicator | Multiphase combined model | Venous phase model | Arterial phase model | Delayed phase model |
| SMOTE-processed training set (n = 178) | ||||
| H-L test χ2 | 5.842 | 8.726 | 11.245 | 9.324 |
| H-L test P value | 0.664 | 0.365 | 0.187 | 0.316 |
| Calibration curve slope | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.87 |
| Calibration curve intercept | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.15 |
| Validation set (n = 60) | ||||
| H-L test χ2 | 4.926 | 6.542 | 8.734 | 7.658 |
| H-L test P value | 0.765 | 0.587 | 0.365 | 0.468 |
| Calibration curve slope | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| Calibration curve intercept | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| Clinical net benefit | ||||
| Net benefit at threshold probability 0.25 | 0.224 | 0.192 | 0.158 | 0.176 |
| Avoidable unnecessary surgeries (%) | 33.7 | 28.5 | 23.2 | 25.6 |
- Citation: Mu XD, Ji DX, Kang DQ. Application value of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics in preoperative evaluation of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(2): 115404
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i2/115404.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404