©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2026; 18(2): 115404
Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404
Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404
Table 5 DeLong test comparison of area under the curve between different models
| Model comparison | SMOTE-processed training set (n = 178) | Validation set (n = 60) | ||
| AUC difference | P value | AUC difference | P value | |
| Multiphase vs arterial phase | 0.093 | 0.009 | 0.095 | 0.025 |
| Multiphase vs venous phase | 0.035 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.038 |
| Multiphase vs delayed phase | 0.068 | 0.018 | 0.070 | 0.032 |
| Venous phase vs arterial phase | 0.058 | 0.028 | 0.053 | 0.041 |
| Venous phase vs delayed phase | 0.033 | 0.044 | 0.028 | 0.046 |
| Delayed phase vs arterial phase | 0.025 | 0.135 | 0.025 | 0.158 |
- Citation: Mu XD, Ji DX, Kang DQ. Application value of multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics in preoperative evaluation of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(2): 115404
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i2/115404.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.115404