©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2026; 18(2): 113870
Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.113870
Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.113870
Table 2 Comprehensive summary of deep learning architectures for hepatocellular carcinoma studies
| Ref. | Year | DL architecture | Application area | Modality/efficiency techniques | Key findings | Challenges addressed |
| Aatresh et al[96] | 2021 | LiverNet (CNN-like model) | Histopathology | H&E stained liver histopathology images | Accuracy of 90.93% on the proposed KMC liver dataset for distinguishing HCC subtypes | Diagnosing low sub-type liver HCC tumors correctly |
| Hamm et al[71] | 2019 | CNN | Lesion classification | Multi-phasic MRI/CNN | AUC 0.992 for lesion classification | Ungrouped lesions make classification harder in clinical use |
| Ioannou et al[75] | 2020 | DL RNN | Risk prediction | EHR time-series/sequential data modeling | AUC 0.76 for 3-year HCC risk, RNN models performed better in virologic responders (AUC 0.806) | External validation, computational cost, etc. |
| Ma et al[77] | 2024 | Transformer dense CenterNet (TDCenterNet) | Liver tumor detection | CT images/attention mechanism | Improved capturing lesions with different sizes | Feature deficiency, ignoring lesions with varies sizes, etc. |
| Deshpande et al[83] | 2024 | Hybrid DL (like CNN, ResNet50, EfficientNetb3, etc.) | Grade classification | Histopathology/slide images | > 97% accuracy for HCC grade classification | Interpretable histopathological images, high parameter count of the models |
| Qu et al[95] | 2025 | DL model | Subtype identification | Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI | Identified proliferative HCC subtype (AUC 0.94 for external test set) | Limited labeled data utilization |
| Li et al[97] | 2025 | HTRecNet (hybrid) | Differential diagnosis | Histopathological data (including images) | Early and accurate differentiation of HCC and CCA from normal liver tissues (accuracy of 0.97 in external testing) | Computational resource requirements, integrating AI models into clinical practice, etc. |
| Wang et al[79] | 2025 | Gabor attention + transformer | Segmentation | CT/hierarchical monitoring | Enhanced tumor segmentation accuracy | Multimodal data fusion |
| He et al[98] | 2025 | AI/ML | Molecular subtype discovery | Multi-omics integration/dimensionality reduction | Novel molecular subtype identification | Heterogeneity of HCC, dimensionality, integration of data |
| He et al[106] | 2024 | DL (like UNet, swim transformer) | Microvascular invasion and HCC prediction | CT/clinical parameters/attention modules | Predicted microvascular invasion/HCC (AUC > 0.94) | Clinical outcome stratification |
| Lei et al[121] | 2024 | Multimodal DL | Microvascular invasion prediction | CT/MRI/feature fusion | Improved microvascular invasion prediction (AUC 0.844-0.871) | Data heterogeneity |
| Paproki et al[111] | 2024 | GANs | Data augmentation | Synthetic data/data augmentation | Reduced bias in training datasets | Data diversity and fairness |
| Xia et al[76] | 2024 | CRNN | Survival prediction | Multi modal (CT scans + clinical variables) | Improved survival prediction (AUC of 0.777 and 0.704 in the validation and test sets) | Temporal-spatial analysis |
| Mitrea et al[92] | 2023 | CNN + traditional ML | HCC detection | Ultrasound/data augmentation | > 98% accuracy for HCC detection | Noise reduction in low-quality images |
| Yasaka et al[72] | 2018 | CNN | Lesion classification | Dynamic CT/standard CNN | High accuracy distinguishing liver masses on CT (median AUC 0.92) | Generalizability |
| Cao et al[73] | 2022 | CNN | Lesion differentiation | Non-contrast CT | High accuracy distinguishing HCC vs hemangioma on non-contrast CT | Handling low-contrast images |
| Wang et al[74] | 2020 | SCCNN | Differential diagnosis | CT/multi-branch fusion | Improved HCC vs cholangiocarcinoma classification (AUC > 0.95) | Multi-class lesion discrimination |
- Citation: Akbulut S, Colak C. Pioneering efficient deep learning architectures for enhanced hepatocellular carcinoma prediction and clinical translation. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(2): 113870
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i2/113870.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i2.113870