BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2026; 18(1): 113553
Published online Jan 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i1.113553
Table 2 MicroRNA’s associated with colorectal cancer molecular subtype and their clinical relevance[150,151]
CMS class
Molecular features
Frequency (%)
Immune phenotype
Prognosis
miR
Ref.
CMS1: Immune MSICIMP (increase); BRAFV600E m; hypermutated; KRASwt; TP53wt14Immune activation and infiltration LTC and NKIntermediate prognosis; good early disease control but poor survival after relapsemiR-625 (increase), miR-31 (increase), miR-155 (increase)Adam et al[150]
CMS2: Canonical (epithelial differentiation)CIMP negative; BRAFwt; KRASwt; TP53m37WNT and MYC activation. Immune dessertBest overallmiR-592 (increase), miR-552 (increase)Adam et al[150]
CMS3: MetabolicCIMP negative; BRAFwt; KRASm; TP53wt13Metabolic deregulationPoor immunogenicitymiR-625 (increase)Adam et al[150]
CMS4: MesenchymalCIMP negative; BRAFwt; KRASwt23Stromal infiltration (macrophages) TGF-β activator-CSC EMT and angiogenesisWorse and poor survival. Resistant standard treatmentmiR-625 (decrease), miR-143 (increase) (CMS4 vs CMS2); miR-200 (decrease), miR-218 (increase)Adam et al[150]; Gherman et al[151]


Write to the Help Desk