©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2025; 17(9): 107651
Published online Sep 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i9.107651
Published online Sep 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i9.107651
Table 3 Threshold effect analysis in different gender groups
| UA, mg/dL | Total (n = 8080) | Males (n = 4498) | Females (n = 3582) | |||
| OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
| Turingpoint | 4.79 | 4.69 | 4.83 | |||
| < Turingpoint | 0.43 (0.37-0.49) | < 0.001 | 0.34 (0.26-0.44) | < 0.001 | 0.39 (0.33-0.47) | < 0.001 |
| > Turingpoint | 0.78 (0.72-0.84) | < 0.001 | 0.73 (0.67-0.80) | < 0.001 | 1.01 (0.88-1.15) | 0.9362 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||
- Citation: Sun TF, Fan KX, Luo YX, Song J, Han ZX, Zhang XL. Relationship between uric acid and colon cancer risk: Dose-response analysis and mechanisms. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(9): 107651
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i9/107651.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i9.107651