BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2025; 17(9): 103816
Published online Sep 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i9.103816
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups, n (%)
Baseline data
Experimental group (n = 41)
Control group (n = 42)
P value
Sex
    Male20 (48.8)27 (64.3)0.154
    Female21 (51.2)15 (35.7)
Age
    > 6017 (41.5)23 (54.8)0.225
    ≤ 6024 (58.5)19 (45.2)
ECOG PS score
    024 (58.5)24 (57.1)0.898
    117 (41.5)18 (42.9)
HBV infection
    No14 (34.1)12 (28.6)0.584
    Yes27 (65.9)30 (71.4)
Cirrhosis
    No14 (34.1)9 (21.4)0.196
    Yes27 (65.9)33 (78.6)
Child-Pugh
    A17 (41.5)18 (42.9)0.898
    B24 (58.5)24 (57.1)
AFP (ng/mL)
    < 40034 (82.9)30 (71.4)0.213
    ≥ 4007 (17.1)12 (28.6)
CA19-9 (U/mL)
    > 10007 (17.1)10 (23.8)0.447
    ≤ 100034 (82.9)32 (76.2)
Max tumor size (mm)
    > 5020 (48.8)24 (57.1)0.445
    ≤ 5021 (51.2)18 (42.9)
Tumor number
    One7 (17.1)6 (14.3)0.727
    More than one34 (82.9)36 (85.7)
Large vessel invasion
    No25 (61.0)32 (76.2)0.135
    Yes16 (39.0)10 (23.8)
Extrahepatic metastasis
    No25 (61.0)21 (50.0)0.315
    Yes16 (39.0)21 (50.0)
TKIs
    Lenvatinib26 (63.4)24 (57.1)0.121
    Anlotinib11 (26.8)7 (16.7)
    Sofantinib4 (9.8)11 (26.2)
PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors
    Camrelizumab19 (46.3)21 (50.0)0.815
    Toripalimab14 (34.2)15 (35.7)
    Pembrolizumab8 (19.5)6 (14.3)


Write to the Help Desk