Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2025; 17(8): 108679
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.108679
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.108679
Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic analysis of standard apparent diffusion coefficient, pure diffusion coefficient, mean diffusion coefficient and mean kurtosis coefficient for the prediction and diagnostic performance in the hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma groups
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve | Cutoff | Youden index | Sensitivity | Specificity | 95%CI | |
Standard apparent diffusion coefficient | 0.874 | 1.25 | 0.6239 | 95 | 67.39 | 0.769–0.943 |
Pure diffusion coefficient | 0.793 | 1.32 | 0.4957 | 80 | 69.57 | 0.676–0.883 |
Mean kurtosis coefficient | 0.733 | 650.2 | 0.5739 | 90 | 67.39 | 0.609–0.834 |
Mean diffusion coefficient | 0.757 | 1.41 | 0.4348 | 100 | 43.48 | 0.635–0.854 |
All | 0.895 | 0.46 | 0.6348 | 70 | 93.38 | 0.794–0.957 |
- Citation: Li SM, Feng MW, Ji GH, Song XP, Mao W, Zhou T, Guo XF, Yuan ZL, Liu YL. Value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(8): 108679
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i8/108679.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.108679