Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2025; 17(8): 108679
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.108679
Table 2 Comparison of standard apparent diffusion coefficient, imaging intravoxel incoherent motion (pure diffusion coefficient, perfusion fraction, pseudo diffusion coefficient), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (mean diffusion coefficient and mean kurtosis coefficient) parameters between the hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma groups

Hepatocellular carcinoma
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
t value
P value
Standard apparent diffusion coefficient (× 10-3 mm²/second)1.14 ± 0.231.54 ± 0.27-6.0730.000b
Pure diffusion coefficient (× 10-3 mm²/second)1.23 ± 0.241.52 ± 0.38-3.700.000b
Perfusion fraction (× 10-3)190.45 ± 121.71167.05 ± 89.240.7730.443
Pseudo diffusion coefficient (× 10-3 mm²/second)87.15 ± 55.8349.90 ± 11.151.4050.165
Mean kurtosis coefficient (× 10-3 mm²/second)706.48 ± 204.62605.19 ± 82.232.1330.037a
Mean diffusion coefficient (× 10-3 mm²/second)1.53 ± 0.391.92 ± 0.370.6860.000b