©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2025; 17(7): 107211
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107211
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107211
Figure 5 Evaluation and analysis of the gastric cancer stemness sensitivity model.
A and B: Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for prognosis prediction in The Cancer Genome Atlas training set; C and D: KM survival and ROC curves for prognosis prediction in the GSE84437 validation set; E: Differences in the immune microenvironment between high and low gastric cancer stemness sensitivity (GCSS) score groups; F-I: Correlation analysis between GCSS scores and functional pathways, with enrichment shown in GO, HALLMARK, KEGG, and REACTOME databases. aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01, cP < 0.001. TCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas; GCSS: Gastric cancer stemness sensitivity; KEGG: Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
- Citation: Pu WF, Yang X, Wang XQ, Guo XG, Yang MY. Stemness signatures reflect prognostic disturbances in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 107211
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i7/107211.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107211