BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Basic Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2025; 17(12): 110736
Published online Dec 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i12.110736
Figure 2
Figure 2 Mg2+ influx and total Mg content in cancer spheroids. A: Mg2+ influx in parental HT-29 cells compared with spheroid (SP)-derived HT-29 cells; B: Mg2+ influx in SP cells with or without the Mg2+ channel inhibitor Co(III)hexamine; C: Mg2+ influx in SP cells with or without the transient receptor potential melastatin 6/7 inhibitor 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate; D: Mg2+ influx in SP cells with or without the transient receptor potential melastatin 6 inhibitor Mesendogen; E: Michaelis-Menten kinetic analysis of ΔF/F values between 40 and 160 seconds in parental HT-29 vs SP cells, SP vs SP with Co(III)hexamine, SP vs SP with 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate, and SP vs SP with Mesendogen; F: Total intracellular Mg2+ content; G: Free intracellular Mg2+ level. SP: Spheroid; Co(III)hex: Co(III)hexamine; 2-APB: 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate; ME: Mesendogen. aP < 0.05 vs parental HT-29 cells, bP < 0.01 vs parental HT-29 cells, cP < 0.001 vs parental HT-29 cells, dP < 0.05 vs spheroid group, eP < 0.01 vs spheroid group, and fP < 0.001 vs spheroid group.


Write to the Help Desk