BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2025; 17(11): 112981
Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.112981
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression for objective responds rates
FactorsUnivariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Sex (female vs male)0.62 (0.24-1.55)0.302
Age (< 60 vs ≥ 60), years0.74 (0.30-1.85)0.520
BMI (≥ 25 vs < 25), kg/m20.77 (0.21-2.87)0.701
CEA (< 3 vs ≥ 3), ng/mL1.68 (0.67-4.20)0.266
CA199 (< 37 vs ≥ 37), U/mL1.31 (0.55-3.11)0.543
ECOG PS (0 vs 1)1.42 (0.54-3.74)0.480
Staging (3 vs 4)2.49 (1.15-5.40)0.0210.61 (0.15-2.45)0.483
Differentiation (low vs medium-high)0.08 (0.03-0.22)< 0.0010.11 (0.03-0.40)< 0.001
Site (stomach vs gastric and esophageal binding)1.14 (0.50-2.58)0.760
Liver metastasis (no vs yes)1.54 (0.59-3.98)0.376
Peritoneal metastasis (no vs yes)2.66 (1.13-6.26)0.0252.13 (0.54-8.44)0.284
PD-L1 expression (CPS < 5 vs CPS ≥ 5)0.07 (0.02-0.28)< 0.0010.13 (0.02-0.66)0.014
MMR status (dMMR vs pMMR)0.11 (0.04-0.31)< 0.0010.15 (0.04-0.61)0.008
EBV status (infect vs no-infect)0.27 (0.08-0.89)0.0310.32 (0.05-2.14)0.242
CALLY index0.86 (0.79-0.92)< 0.0010.88 (0.81-0.95)0.002
NLR1.16 (0.95-1.41)0.144
SII1.28 (1.10-1.48)0.0011.33 (1.05-1.69)0.017


Write to the Help Desk