©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2025; 17(10): 111163
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.111163
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.111163
Table 5 Comparison of performance metrics under the clinical threshold corresponding to the maximized Youden index of the three machine learning models
| Datasets | Prediction models | Precision | Accuracy | Recall | F1 index | Youden index | Best threshold |
| Training set | Decision tree | 0.657 | 0.867 | 1.000 | 0.793 | 0.822 | 0.130 |
| Logistic regression | 0.641 | 0.856 | 0.989 | 0.778 | 0.800 | 0.192 | |
| SVM | 0.641 | 0.856 | 0.989 | 0.778 | 0.800 | 0.173 | |
| Validation set | Decision tree | 0.667 | 0.888 | 1.000 | 0.800 | 0.856 | 0.219 |
| Logistic regression | 0.611 | 0.855 | 0.971 | 0.750 | 0.793 | 0.168 | |
| SVM | 0.750 | 0.921 | 0.971 | 0.846 | 0.877 | 0.195 |
- Citation: An Y, Sun YG, Feng S, Wang YS, Chen YY, Jiang J. Constructing a prediction model for delayed wound healing after gastric cancer radical surgery based on three machine learning algorithms. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(10): 111163
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i10/111163.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.111163