©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2022; 14(9): 1711-1726
Published online Sep 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1711
Published online Sep 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1711
Table 4 The complete response rate and univariate regression of consolidation chemotherapy in the original samples before matching, after propensity score match and inverse probability of treatment weighting in the two groups
| CR | Univariate regression | ||||
| non-CC group, n (%) | CC group, n (%) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
| Original samples | 21 (16.3) | 33 (24.3) | 0.107 | 1.648 (0.895-3.033) | 0.109 |
| PSM | 17 (16.2) | 29 (27.6) | 0.045 | 1.975 (1.008-3.871) | 0.047 |
| IPTW | 21 (16.3) | 35 (25.9) | 0.045 | 1.185 (1.008-3.395) | 0.047 |
- Citation: Sheng XQ, Wang HZ, Li S, Zhang YZ, Geng JH, Zhu XG, Quan JZ, Li YH, Cai Y, Wang WH. Consolidation chemotherapy with capecitabine after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in high-risk patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Propensity score study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(9): 1711-1726
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v14/i9/1711.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1711