Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2019; 11(5): 436-448
Published online May 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i5.436
Table 6 Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics between hepatic neuroendocrine tumor and hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma groups, n (%)
Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound characteristicshNET group, n = 35hNEC group, n = 20t/χ2P value
Initial enhancement time in s16.83 ± 5.0816.28 ± 4.930.8340.854
Washout to iso-enhancement time in s30.84 ± 10.3827.68 ± 9.741.8560.804
Washout to hypo-enhancement time in s65.28 ± 37.8451.72 ± 31.851.1520.833
Enhancement level at arterial phaseHigh33 (94.3)20 (100.0)1.1860.276
Equal2 (5.7)0 (0)
Low0 (0)0 (0)
Enhancement level at portal venous phaseEqual7 (20.0)0 (0)4.5830.032
Low28 (80.0)20 (100.0)
Enhancement level at late phaseEqual1 (2.9)1 (5.0)-1.0001
Low34 (97.1)19 (95.0)
Enhancement formsFast forward and fast out34 (97.1)19 (95.0)-1.0001
Equal/slow forward and fast out1 (2.9)1 (5.0)
Enhancement formsUniform28 (80.0)5 (25.0)16.0420.000
Non-uniform7 (20.0)15 (75.0)
Tumor vasculatureYes15 (42.9)19 (95.0)14.6610.000
No20 (57.1)1 (5.0)
Tumor necrosisYes10 (28.6)6 (30.0)0.0130.911
No25 (71.4)14 (70.0)
Capsule enhancementYes6 (17.1)1 (5.0)-0.4021
No29 (82.9)19 (95.0)