Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2018; 10(10): 282-289
Published online Oct 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i10.282
Table 2 Studies for peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery
Ref.Patient No.Treatment group(s)Intraperitoneal regimenSystemic regimenOutcomes
Bonnot et al[30], 2018277CRS alone vs CRS + HIPEC11CRS Alone Median OS: 12.1 moCRS + HIPEC Median OS: 12.1 mo
Yang et al[31], 201168CRS alone vs CRS + HIPECCisplatin and MMC-CRS Alone Median OS: 6.5 moCRS + HIPEC Median OS: 11.0 mo
Glehen et al[32], 2010159CRS with PIC (HIPEC or EPIC)Variable-Median OS: 9.2 mo
Rudloff et al[33], 201416CRS/HIPEC/SC vs SC aloneOxaliplatinFOLFOXIRISC Alone 4.3 moCRS/HIPEC/SC Median OS: 11.3 mo
Canbay et al[34], 2014194NA systemic and IP chemo, then CRS and HIPEC if responsiveDocetaxel and cisplatinOral S-178.3% had negative cytology and underwent CRS and HIPEC
No response (no CRS or HIPEC) Median OS: 7.5 moResponse (CRS with HIPEC) Median OS: 15.8 mo
Yonemura et al[38], 2017105NLHIPEC → CRS or NLHIPEC → NIPS → CRSDocetaxel and cisplatinOral S-1, IV docetaxel and cisplatinNLHIPEC + CRS Median OS: 14.1 mo PCI: 14.2 → 11.8NLHIPEC + NIPS + CRS Median OS: 19.2 mo PCI: 14.8 → 9.9