Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2020; 12(12): 532-541
Published online Dec 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i12.532
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients with a history of bariatric surgery who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy
Case
Age Sex
Type of bariatric surgery
Pre-POEM Eckardt Score
Achalasia subtype
IRP (normal < 15)
Prior achalasia treatment1
Months from bariatric surgery to POEM
154 MSG91NA2Heller myotomy47
268 MSG6222.2Botulinum toxin injection71
353 FSG7123.7Botulinum toxin injection; Heller myotomy3165
443 FRYGB10221.2None96
531 MRYGB44228Botulinum toxin injection84
637 FRYGB10236None122
Table 2 Procedural data for peroral endoscopic myotomy
POEM Procedural data (n = 6)
Mean (range)
Submucosal Tunnel length, cm12.3 (11-14)
Myotomy length, cm9.3 (9-10)
Extension of myotomy into cardia, cm2.2 (2-3)
Clips, number5 (3-7)
POEM time, min79.8 (47-105)
Table 3 Outcomes of patients with a history of bariatric surgery who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy
Case
Type of bariatric surgery
Technical success
Clinical success
Post-POEM Eckardt score
Adverse events
Follow up, mo
Endoscopy findings
Medical comorbities
1SGYesYes3No37Grade A esophagitisHTN, HLD
2SGYesNo6Minor121Candida esophagitis; EndoFLIP DI: 10.22 COPD, TIA, OSA, HTN, type 2 diabetes
3SGYesYes2No13Grade B esophagitisEndoFLIP DI: 5.13None
4RYGBYesNo10No21NAMajor depressive disorder, chronic migraines
5RYGBYesYes2No33NANone
6RYGBYesYes2No1.5NAHypothyroidism