Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2019; 11(5): 365-372
Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.365
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients who underwent fully covered self-expanding metal stent placement with or without double-pigtail plastic stent
CharacteristicDeterminantFrequency countPercent of total frequency
GenderFemale8843.34
Male11556.65
RaceBlack94.43
White19495.56
AgeMean (62.97); Range (23.00-91.00)
Brand of FCSEMSViabil fully covered9044.33
Viabil fully covered with proximal fenestration6331.03
WallFlex5024.63
Cholangitis drainageNo19194.08
Yes125.91
Choledocholithiasis at time of stent placementNo18892.61
Yes157.38
History of cholecystectomyNo9245.32
Yes11154.67
History of stent migrationNo19696.55
Yes73.44
Length of FCSEMS (cm)43014.77
610652.21
84723.15
10209.85
Length of Stricture (mm)Mean (19.21); Range (0.00-90.00)
CBD diameter (mm)Mean (11.19); Range (3.00-35.00)
Malignant strictureNo10853.20
Yes9546.79
MigrationNo18591.13
Yes188.86
Post sphincterotomy bleedNo19495.56
Yes94.43
Previous sphincterotomyNo12059.11
Yes8340.88
Sphincterotomy at time of stent deploymentNo8240.39
Yes12159.60
Table 2 Comparison between patients who had migration of fully covered self-expanding metal stent placement (FCSEMS) and patient who had no migration of FCSEMS
CharacteristicDeterminantMigration (n = 18)No migration (n = 185)P-value
GenderFemale5 (27.8%)83 (44.9%)0.1626
Male13 (72.2%)102 (55.1%)-
Agemean ± SD (range)59.83 (12.38) - (34.00, 91.00)63.28 (15.23) - (23.00, 91.00)0.3539
RaceBlack2 (11.1%)7 (3.8%)0.1494
White16 (88.9%)178 (96.2%)-
Post sphincterotomy bleedNo17 (94.4%)177 (95.7%)0.8086
Yes1 (5.6%)8 (4.3%)-
Bile leakNo18 (100.0%)165 (89.2%)0.1418
Yes0 (0.0%)20 (10.8%)-
Benign biliary strictureNo6 (33.3%)115 (62.2%)0.0173
Yes12 (66.7%)70 (37.8%)-
Cholangitis drainageNo18 (100.0%)173 (93.5%)0.2653
Yes0 (0.0%)12 (6.5%)-
Malignant strictureNo13 (72.2%)95 (51.4%)0.0902
Yes5 (27.8%)90 (48.6%)-
Brand of FCSEMSViabil fully covered8 (44.4%)82 (44.3%)0.2294
Viabil fully covered with proximal fenestration3 (16.7%)60 (32.4%)-
WallFlex7 (38.9%)43 (23.2%)-
Length of FCSEMS (cm)42 (11.1%)28 (15.1%)0.9376
69 (50.0%)97 (52.4%)-
85 (27.8%)42 (22.7%)-
102 (11.1%)18 (9.7%)-
Anchored FCSEMSs with DPSNo14 (77.8%)124 (67.0%)0.3507
Yes4 (22.2%)61 (33.0%)-
Length of stricture (mm)mean ± SD (range)14.67 (10.72) - (0.00, 40.00)19.65 (19.32) - (0.00, 90.00)0.0958
CBD diameter (mm)mean ± SD (range)11.61 (4.50) - (5.00,22.00)11.15 (4.70) - (3.00,35.00)0.6878
History of cholecystectomyNo5 (27.8%)87 (47.0%)0.1173
Yes13 (72.2%)98 (53.0%)-
Previous sphincterotomyNo6 (33.3%)114 (61.6%)0.0198
Yes12 (66.7%)71 (38.4%)-
Sphincterotomy at time of stent deploymentNo9 (50.0%)73 (39.5%)0.3843
Yes9 (50.0%)112 (60.5%)-
History of stent migrationNo17 (94.4%)179 (96.8%)0.6078
Yes1 (5.6%)6 (3.2%)-
Choledocholithiasis at time of stent placementNo16 (88.9%)172 (93.0%)0.5272
Yes2 (11.1%)13 (7.0%)-