©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2017; 9(12): 561-570
Published online Dec 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561
Published online Dec 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561
Table 3 Features of lesions on which endoscopic submucosal dissection has been attempted n (%)
| Variable | Value, n = 25 |
| Location of lesion | |
| Upper stomach | 4 (16) |
| Mid stomach | 7 (28) |
| Lower stomach | 14 (56) |
| Average of longer axis of lesion (mm) | |
| Mean ± SD | 24.7 ± 11.7 |
| Range | 10-50 |
| Histological grade at baseline | |
| IMC | 13 (52) |
| HGD | 8 (32) |
| LGD | 3 (12) |
| Invasive | 1 (4) |
- Citation: Sooltangos A, Davenport M, McGrath S, Vickers J, Senapati S, Akhtar K, George R, Ang Y. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for early neoplasia and for accurate staging of early cancers in a United Kingdom Caucasian population. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(12): 561-570
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i12/561.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i12.561