Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 25, 2015; 7(17): 1250-1256
Published online Nov 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1250
Table 1 Baseline data of the participants (n = 61)
Male/female (%)44 (72%)/17 (28%)
Median age65
(range, yr)(40-86)
Total detected lesion234
Median detected lesion per patient (range)3 (1-16)
Location
Cecum19 (8%)
Ascending colon61 (26%)
Transverse colon56 (24%)
Descending colon33 (14%)
Sigmoid colon52 (22%)
Rectum13 (6%)
Morphology
Protruded, sessile205 (88%)
Superficial, elevated29 (12%)
Median detected polyp size4
(range, mm)(1-9)
Endoscopist
Expert79 (34%)
Senior resident155 (66%)
Histological type
Not retrieved28 (12%)
Non-neoplastic polyp28 (12%)
Neoplastic polyp176 (76%)
Horizontal margin (neoplastic lesion only)
HM 0104 (59%)
HM 12 (1%)
HM X70 (40%)