Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 25, 2015; 7(13): 1103-1106
Published online Sep 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1103
Published online Sep 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1103
Table 2 Number and percentage of "Yes" answers for each question from each reviewer
| Reviewer | Caecum | Appendiceal orifice | Triradiate fold | ||
| 1 | 99 | 76 | 77% | 13 | 17% |
| 2 | 95 | 79 | 83% | 17 | 22% |
| 3 | 96 | 76 | 79% | 13 | 17% |
| 4 | 93 | 89 | 96% | 18 | 20% |
| 5 | 100 | 89 | 89% | 11 | 12% |
| 6 | 97 | 73 | 75% | 13 | 18% |
| Average | 97 | 80 | 83% | 14 | 18% |
- Citation: Finlayson A, Chandra R, Hastie IA, Jones IT, Shedda S, Hong MKY, Yen A, Hayes IP. Triradiate caecal fold: Is it a useful landmark for caecal intubation in colonoscopy? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(13): 1103-1106
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i13/1103.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1103